Tax-hungry American states consider ecommerce delivery fees to fund road repair

As consumer and business ecommerce spending continues to increase and even more deliveries are made, more states including New York, Ohio, Nevada, Minnesota, Colorado, and Washington are exploring taxing delivery fees for road repair revenue.

Cash-strapped states and other municipal governments are no strangers to taxing e-commerce to generate revenue.

States have been collecting sales tax on ecommerce purchases by consumers and businesses for years.

Now, a growing number of states, including Colorado, Minnesota and Washington, are looking for options. Solutions include collecting a percentage of the fee consumers and businesses pay to have ecommerce packages delivered to homes or offices to pay for road repair and related projects.

For example, in 2022, Colorado became the first state to impose a retail delivery fee. That became one component of a 10-year, $5.4 billion transportation funding package. The retail delivery fee is expected to bring in $78 million a year. At that level, the fee represented approximately 15% of new revenues in the package.

All businesses were initially required to collect and remit a 27-cent fee on each retail delivery order by motor vehicle placed to a location in Colorado. Since being implemented, the fee has increased to 28 cents. However, Colorado also has amended the law to exempt businesses with $500,000 or less in annual sales from having to collect the fee.

Currently, two states Colorado and Minnesota have passed bills that collect a percentage of ecommerce delivery fees for fixing roads, bridges, and related transportation infrastructure.

Now, Washington is considering similar legislation. Washington has 57,000 miles of city and county streets. They account for 71% of the total miles in the state, according to the Washington State Department of Transportation.

Cities primarily fund their transportation systems on their own. As they do, 69% of transportation expenditures come from local sources, which face pressure due to competing local demands and structural budget deficits.

Meanwhile, the state’s share, which comes from state fuel tax receipts, is in decline. As a result, local governments are searching for new transportation revenue sources, according to a newly published report from the Washington State Joint Transportation Committee.